Crown Corporation (2024)

“Mixed” Economy

The first Canadian crown corporation, the Board of Works, was established in 1841. It was tasked with constructing a shipping canal systemin the Province of Canada. By 2019, there were 47 crown corporations in operation across the country. They were created by governments to provide importantservices in a vast, sparsely populated nation; usually because the private sector was unable or unwilling to provide them, rather than because of a preference for public ownership perse.

Many of the most significant crown corporations created in the 20th century were designed to meet transportation needs. They included Canadian National Railways (CN)and Air Canada (both of which have since been privatized); as well as the St. Lawrence SeawayAuthority (now the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation).

After the Second World War, a number of federal crown corporations emerged as important providers of loans and financial services to groups whose needs were not alwaysmet by private institutions. These groups included farmers (Farm Credit Corporation), small businesses (Business Development Bank of Canada) and exporters (Export DevelopmentCorporation). The federal government has at times owned and operated coal mines (Cape Breton Development Corporation) as well as Petro-Canada, a major integrated oil andgas company that is now privatized.

In recent years, crown corporations have been developed to meet emerging needs. In 2002, The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA) was formed to provide passenger and baggage screening at airports. This was a direct response to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001.

Crown corporations are the essence of Canada’s “mixed” economy; a combination of government versus privately-owned enterprise. They create a distinct difference between the industrial organization of Canada and the United States.In the US, state-owned enterprises are less common.

Provincial Crown Corporations

In most provinces, crown corporations are responsible for generating and transmitting electricity(e.g. Hydro-Québec); for gaming and lotteries (e.g. Manitoba Lotteries Corporation); and for sellingliquor (e.g., the Liquor Control Board of Ontario). Some provinces also own telecommunication firms (e.g., SaskTel). Others have owned miningand manufacturing companies; such as the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan (now private) andthe Sydney Steel Corporation of Nova Scotia (now defunct). In British Columbia, Saskatchewan,Manitoba and Quebec, crown corporations have sold automobile insurance.In Alberta, BC and Ontario, they have operated railways.

Government-owned companies have traditionally had special prominence in Quebec and Saskatchewan. After the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation’s landmarkelectoral victory in Saskatchewan in 1944, crown corporations were seen as an important way of building a more diversified economy. Since the early 1960s, successive Quebec governments have also employed crown corporations to diversify the provincialeconomy; to preserve and create jobs; and to nurture francophone managers. Hydro-Québec is a major example. Crown corporations were also established in Quebec’s steel,oil and gas, forestry and asbestosindustries.

The Role of Crown Corporations

A central argument for crown corporations is that the commercial activities of government must be shielded from government intervention and legislative oversight to be performed successfully. Crown corporations thus enjoy greater administrative freedomthan ordinary government departments. As government enterprises, however, their autonomy cannot be absolute; it must be tempered by some public control over policy making.The Canadian experience suggests that corporate autonomy, government control and legislative oversight are often conflicting and difficult to reconcile.

Government influence over federal crown corporations developed piecemeal. But a key element was section VIII of the 1951 federalFinancial Administration Act (FAA). It organized crown corporations into three schedules or types:departmental; agency; and proprietary. Each of these performed different functions and had a different relationship with the state. Departmental corporations, such as the Economic Council of Canada,performed no obvious commercial functions. They were treated the same as government departments. Agency corporations, such as Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.,were accorded greater freedom. Proprietary corporations, such as Air Canada before it was privatized, enjoyed even greater autonomy in financial matters.

The FAA’s provisions required agency and proprietary corporations to submit annual capital budgets to the responsible minister; as well as to the minister of financeand the president of the Treasury Board. The budgets needed the approval of these three ministers, theCabinet andParliament. Agency corporations also submitted operating budgets for approval to the responsible minister and the president of the Treasury Board. Cabinet controlled the appointments,remuneration and dismissal of crown corporations’ boards of directors and senior officers. In theory, boards provided the key link between the government and corporate management. However, in practice, their effectiveness was often undermined by a lackof precise definitions of the powers, duties and responsibilities of boards; as well as by political patronage in the selection of board members and by the federal government’scontroversial practice of appointing senior civil servants to the boards.

Controversy, Debate and Reform

The traditionally quiet environment surrounding federal crown corporations was shattered in the 1970s. A major debate emerged about their roles and effectiveness. At the heart of the debate was the view that the scope and economic importance of crowncorporations had outdistanced Ottawa’s capacity to control them. There was a belief that crown corporations had become too prominent in the economy.

To many observers, the FAA was antiquated. Some felt that major crown corporations, particularly CN, had escaped political control. Successiveauditors-general criticized the financial management of crown corporations. Controversy also surrounded the activities of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.and Air Canada. Petro-Canada’s rapid expansion and Via Rail’schronic problems fuelled the discontent. The role of crown corporations was also a problem in BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Quebec.

In 1984, Bill C-24 passed. It replaced the FAAwith a new legislative framework. Among other things, the law established new schedules or types of crown corporations. It also extended the Cabinet’sability to issue directives. It stressed that crown corporations can neither establish nor dispose of subsidiaries without Cabinet approval. It clarified the process of budgetary approval. And it ensured that corporate plans be submitted to Cabinet forapproval and to Parliament for discussion. These reforms, however, did not satisfy critics. They suggested that Bill C-24 generally codified existing procedures and policies, broke little new ground, and left major problems unsolved.

In 2003, an auditor-general investigation into a federal sponsorship program revealed financial management concerns at a number of crown corporations; they included Canada Post, VIA andthe Business Development Bank of Canada. A subsequent report by retired judge John Gomeryled to major reforms at crown corporations and to the 2006 Federal Accountability Act. The Act extended the list of crown corporations accountable under the Access to Information Act;brought changes to the appointment of board members and restricted the number of civil servants on boards; and split the Chief Executive Officer and Chair roles into two distinct positions.

Privatization

In the mid-1980s, there was a widespread sell-off of public assets in the United Kingdom under British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. In response, the government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney appointed a minister of state for privatization. They oversaw the sale of iconic crown corporations such as Petro-Canadaand Air Canada; as well as de Havilland Aircraft Co. and Canadair.Between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s, various other key crown corporations were also privatized by Ottawa and the provinces alike; they included CN, the Alberta Liquor Control Board and Nova Scotia Power.

In 2013, Stephen Harper’s government introduced measures in its budget bill giving it new powers over collective bargaining, salaries and working conditions at fourcrown corporations, including the CBC.

Current Federal Crown Corporations

See also Public Ownership; Economic Council of Canada; Crown;Crown Land.