What is the logical fallacy answering with a question?
A complex question is a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior answer to a prior question. Also known as (or closely related to) a loaded question, a trick question, a leading question, the fallacy of the false question, and the fallacy of many questions.
A complex question is a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior answer to a prior question. Also known as (or closely related to) a loaded question, a trick question, a leading question, the fallacy of the false question, and the fallacy of many questions.
(6) The fallacy of many questions (plurimum interrogationum) consists in demanding or giving a single answer to a question when this answer could either be divided (example: “Do you like the twins?” “Neither yes nor no; but Ann yes and Mary no.”) or refused altogether, because a…
Loaded questions are a type of logical fallacy, a faulty course of reasoning. In the case of loaded questions, the interrogator's logic is flawed when he or she poses a question that is grounded in something that is speculative at best or patently untrue.
Examples. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives this example of argumentum ad baculum: If you don't join our demonstration against the expansion of the park, we will evict you from your apartment; So, you should join our demonstration against the expansion of the park.
False dilemma fallacy is also known as false dichotomy, false binary, and “either-or” fallacy. It is the fallacy of presenting only two choices, outcomes, or sides to an argument as the only possibilities, when more are available.
Amphiboly is a type of informal common fallacy that involves grammatical ambiguity. The fallacy of amphiboly occurs when the grammar of a statement, be it written or spoken, leaves the statement open to multiple interpretations. Amphibolous statements in writing are often the result of poor sentence structure.
The post hoc fallacy is the assumption that because one event preceded another event, they must be causally related. In other words, the first event must have caused the second. However, the chronological order of two events does not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between them.
An overwhelming exception is an informal fallacy of generalization. It is a generalization that is accurate, but comes with one or more qualifications which eliminate so many cases that what remains is much less impressive than the initial statement might have led one to believe.
Petitio Principii (begging the question or circular argument) is the fallacy of assuming in the premise(s) of an argument a statement which equivalent the conclusion of the argument. Thus, what is to be proved has already been assumed in the premises.
What is an example of a logical fallacy question?
Hasty generalization logical fallacy example “My father smoked four packs of cigarettes a day from age 14 and lived until the age of 95. So smoking really can't be that bad for you.” Here, there is insufficient evidence (i.e., the exceptional case of one person) to draw a conclusion (smoking is not that bad).
An informal fallacy where personal experience or a singular example is used to support an argument or position instead of compelling evidence. People often gravitate towards using their own experiences or those of people around them as evidence in arguments.
Examples: "Have you stopped beating your wife?" [This is the classic example.] "My question to you is, 'Was it exhausting keeping track of all the lies you were telling people?'
Argumentum Ad Misericordiam (Appeal To Pity): appealing to a person's unfortunate circ*mstance as a way of getting someone to accept a conclusion. For example, "You need to pass me in this course, since I'll lose my scholarship if you don't."
An example of the post hoc fallacy might be: 'Yesterday I ate blackberries, and today I have a stomach ache. The blackberries must have caused this stomach ache. ' While it is not out of the question for the blackberries to be the cause, the stomach ache might also be the result of something else.
A red herring fallacy is a form of logical fallacy or reasoning error that occurs when a misleading argument or question is presented to distract from the main issue or argument at hand. Red herring refers to the piece of information that is used as a diversion.
Definition. A false dilemma is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. In its most simple form, called the fallacy of bifurcation, all but two alternatives are excluded.
The Cartesian mind-body duality is one of modern medicine's greatest fallacies. The mind-body duality asserts that the nature of the mind is completely separate from the nature of the body. The separation of mind and body is not only a false but a dangerous assertion.
Accent, Amphiboly and Equivocation are examples of fallacies of ambiguity. The fallacies of illegitimate presumption include Begging the Question, False Dilemma, No True Scotsman, Complex Question and Suppressed Evidence.
It involves creating an explanation that appears to solve a problem in the moment, but lacks general applicability or coherence. This fallacy is often used to defend a position without addressing the underlying issues or counterarguments.
Is the domino effect a logical fallacy?
The metaphorical usage implies that an outcome is inevitable or highly likely (as it has already started to happen) – a form of slippery slope argument. When this outcome is actually unlikely (the argument is fallacious), it has also been called the domino fallacy.
Dicto simpliciter is a logical fallacy that involves making oversimplified generalizations without considering exceptions, variations, or context. Often these generalizations are derived from specific cases or limited data.
Bulverism (Psychogenetic Fallacy) - inferring why an argument is being used, associating it to some psychological reason, then assuming it is invalid as a result. It is wrong to assume that if the origin of an idea comes from a biased mind, then the idea itself must also be a false.
The slippery slope fallacy is a logical fallacy that claims one event or action will lead to another, more extreme event or action. This could be by directly causing that follow-up event, setting a precedent for it, or simply creating an environment where that follow-up event can occur.
An appeal to probability (or appeal to possibility, also known as possibiliter ergo probabiliter, "possibly, therefore probably") is the logical fallacy of taking something for granted because it would probably be the case (or might possibly be the case).
