What is the fallacy where you ask questions?
Complex question fallacy. The complex question fallacy, or many questions fallacy, is context dependent; a presupposition by itself does not have to be a fallacy. It is committed when someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved.
A complex question fallacy occurs when someone asks a question that presupposes the answer to another question that has not been established or accepted by the other person.
The fallacy of begging the question occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. In other words, you assume without proof the stand/position, or a significant part of the stand, that is in question. Begging the question is also called arguing in a circle.
(6) The fallacy of many questions (plurimum interrogationum) consists in demanding or giving a single answer to a question when this answer could either be divided (example: “Do you like the twins?” “Neither yes nor no; but Ann yes and Mary no.”) or refused altogether, because a…
To 'beg the question' (also called petitio principii) is to attempt to support a claim with a premise that itself restates or presupposes the claim. It is an attempt to prove a proposition while simultaneously taking the proposition for granted.
Definition of 'fallacy of many questions'
the rhetorical trick of asking a question that cannot be answered without admitting a presupposition that may be false, as have you stopped beating your wife? Drag the correct answer into the box. Drag the correct answer into the box.
False dilemma fallacy is also known as false dichotomy, false binary, and “either-or” fallacy. It is the fallacy of presenting only two choices, outcomes, or sides to an argument as the only possibilities, when more are available.
A red herring fallacy is a form of logical fallacy or reasoning error that occurs when a misleading argument or question is presented to distract from the main issue or argument at hand. Red herring refers to the piece of information that is used as a diversion.
- Ad Hominem. Latin for "to the person" - an attack of the person rather than the argument. ...
- The Texas Sharpshooter. ...
- The Bandwagon Fallacy. ...
- Straw Man. ...
- Red Herring. ...
- Hasty Generalization. ...
- Appeal to Authority. ...
- No True Scotsman.
Amphiboly is a type of informal common fallacy that involves grammatical ambiguity. The fallacy of amphiboly occurs when the grammar of a statement, be it written or spoken, leaves the statement open to multiple interpretations. Amphibolous statements in writing are often the result of poor sentence structure.
What is the Bulverism fallacy?
Bulverism is a logical fallacy in which one party simply assumes that the other party is wrong and explains their reasons for wanting to believe it rather than addressing the argument itself. It combines Begging the Question with the Genetic Fallacy.
Loaded Question Fallacy
(Also known as complex question, fallacy of presupposition, trick question) The fallacy of asking a question that has a presupposition built in, which implies something (often questionable) but protects the person asking the question from accusations of false claims or even slander.
Example of bulverism: "You only think that because you're a (man/woman; Black/White; Catholic/Baptist; Democrat/Republican; Christian/Atheist; etc.)" deals with secondary questions about ideas rather than the primary one. avoids the basic question or evading the issues raised by trains of reasoning.
Ad populum fallacy refers to a claim that something is true simply because that's what a large number of people believe. In other words, if many people believe something to be true, then it must be true. Ad populum fallacy example You're at a bookstore browsing for books with a friend.
A non sequitur fallacy is a sequence of reasoning that misses or skips over a key part, making the conclusion invalid (even if the premises are true). For example: My dog is named Max, and he likes to eat dog food. Therefore, everyone named Max likes to eat dog food.
Lesson Summary. The fallacy of affirming the consequent occurs when a person draws a conclusion that if the consequent is true, then the antecedent must also be true. The consequent is the 'then' part of a conditional statement, though at times you won't see the word 'then' used.
If phrased in the form of question, you can't exactly call it a 'fallacy' as such (a question can have a false premise, and it can be a ridiculous question, but it can't actually be fallacious), but it is the same diversionary tactic. Of the Informal or rhetorical fallacies, the Red Herring is one of the most common.
The straight up, direct answer to your question is “inquisitive”. An inquisitive person is one given to asking questions. There are other words to call such a person but they depend on their attitude and the feelings they elicit in others.
This is an argument that attempts to create a situation of absolutes with no options in between such as the following: “Either we intervene or we are basically no better than the Nazis.” This thinking is fallacious because it assumes that there are only two options, with nothing in between.
Equivocation is the fallacy that occurs when the meaning of an ambiguous term is covertly switched during the reasoning. An ambiguous term is used with one meaning at the beginning of the argument, but then used with a different meaning later in the argument.
What is an example of a post hoc fallacy?
Common fallacy examples include: Post hoc: This fallacy states that the first event necessarily caused the second when one event happens after another. For example, a black cat crossed my path, and then I got into a car accident. The black cat caused the car accident.
If a logical compound statement always produces the truth (true value), then it is called a tautology. The opposite of tautology is called fallacy or contradiction, in which the compound statement is always false.
A straw man argument is when someone sets up and then disputes an assertion that is not actually being made. For example, if someone says they love the color blue and someone else argues that red is better, asserting that the first person obviously hates the color red, this would be a straw man argument.
One example of the equivocation fallacy is as follows: "When I asked you if I should turn left, you said right. Therefore, I was correct and you cannot get mad at me." In this argument, "right" is being used equivocally because in one place it means "correct," and in another place, it indicates a direction to turn.
- 1 Ad hominem. ...
- 2 Red herring. ...
- 3 Straw man. ...
- 4 Equivocation. ...
- 5 Slippery slope. ...
- 6 Hasty generalization. ...
- 7 Appeal to authority. ...
- 8 False dilemma.